<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>michaelcolson.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaelcolson.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaelcolson.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 14:54:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NetWrix Free System Administration Tools</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2010/03/06/netwrix-free-system-administration-tools/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2010/03/06/netwrix-free-system-administration-tools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 14:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[active directory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelcolson.com/?p=349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I recently came across NetWrix, a software company that specializes in system administration tools and utilities.  They seem to really have hit a niche that has been a pain point for many administrators over the years.  Whats even better is that NetWrix offers free versions of several of their products and not just limited <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.michaelcolson.com/2010/03/06/netwrix-free-system-administration-tools/">NetWrix Free System Administration Tools</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently came across NetWrix, a software company that specializes in system administration tools and utilities.  They seem to really have hit a niche that has been a pain point for many administrators over the years.  Whats even better is that NetWrix offers free versions of several of their products and not just limited evaluations either.</p>
<p><span id="more-349"></span>The tools that really caught my eye were their:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://netwrix.com/active_directory_change_reporting_freeware.html">Active Directory Change Reporter</a> &#8211; this tool is great for environments with multiple administrators or environments that have delegated administration.  You get to see the before/after value of exactly what was changed and exactly who changed it.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.netwrix.com/inactive_users_tracker_freeware.html">Inactive User Tracker</a> &#8211; I would bet that nearly every Active Directory environment must have dozens, if not hundreds or thousands of accounts that haven&#8217;t been used for long periods of time.  This tool can help to identify these accounts and can even take action to eliminate those open risks.</li>
<li><a href="http://netwrix.com/password_expiration_notifier_freeware.html">Password Expiration Notifer</a> &#8211; I actually wrote an application one time that would pull the last change time stamp from Active Directory and send out an email notification to a user.  This solution does exactly the same thing only without code!  Very handy for users that may never get to a Windows based system where a password reminder is available (VPN, custom LDAP, portal, etc.).</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2010/03/06/netwrix-free-system-administration-tools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SSL Error 47 with Citrix Password Manager</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2010/03/03/ssl-error-47-with-citrix-password-manager/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2010/03/03/ssl-error-47-with-citrix-password-manager/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[password manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelcolson.com/?p=344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>SSL Certificates play a big role in a Citrix Password Manager deployment. They help to ensure the password data in the central store is genuine and they also allow for encrypted communications between the Password Manager service and the Password Manager agent. There are lots of things that can go wrong with certificates that <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.michaelcolson.com/2010/03/03/ssl-error-47-with-citrix-password-manager/">SSL Error 47 with Citrix Password Manager</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SSL Certificates play a big role in a Citrix Password Manager deployment. They help to ensure the password data in the central store is genuine and they also allow for encrypted communications between the Password Manager service and the Password Manager agent. There are lots of things that can go wrong with certificates that will stall your Password Manager deployment.</p>
<p><span id="more-344"></span></p>
<p>I recenty ran across this little gem:</p>
<p><code>[error] SSL Library Error 47 on pm.domain.com:443 with peer 10.20.30.40: An unclassified SSL network error occurred. (error code: error:1408A0C1:lib(20):func(138):reason(193))<br />
[warn] SSL handshake from client failed</code></p>
<p>Well&#8230; now isn&#8217;t that just so helpful.  After verifying and re-verifying my certificate setup I wasn&#8217;t getting anywhere.  I ended up opening the httpd.conf file that the Citrix XTE service depends on and noticed a line near the bottom:</p>
<p> <code>#Allowed CipherSuite (ALL,COM,GOV)<br />
SSLCipherSuite GOV</code></p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t go to the trouble to lookup what &#8216;exactly&#8217; this means but I theorized that I don&#8217;t really want to limit what kind of SSL cipher I can use so why not change it to read:</p>
<p> <code>SSLCipherSuite ALL</code></p>
<p>After making that simple, three letter change, I was now able to hit the Citrix Password Manager service URL from a  web browser and I saw the SSL Error 47 messages in my error.log dissappear.</p>
<p>Hopefully this will save someone else the hours of troubleshooting that I spent on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2010/03/03/ssl-error-47-with-citrix-password-manager/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disable Multimedia Acceleration in XenDesktop</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2010/01/23/disable-multimedia-acceleration-in-xendesktop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2010/01/23/disable-multimedia-acceleration-in-xendesktop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vdi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xendesktop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelcolson.com/?p=341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I recently came across a multimedia application that uses the Indeo codec for its video components.  While this codec is supported by HDX it is only supported when it runs within the context of Windows Media Player, QuickTime, or one of the other supported video players.  This particular application made use of its own <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.michaelcolson.com/2010/01/23/disable-multimedia-acceleration-in-xendesktop/">Disable Multimedia Acceleration in XenDesktop</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently came across a multimedia application that uses the Indeo codec for its video components.  While this codec is supported by HDX it is only supported when it runs within the context of Windows Media Player, QuickTime, or one of the other supported video players.  This particular application made use of its own player which prevented the HDX technologies from enhancing the performance of the videos.</p>
<p><span id="more-341"></span>I should point out that this application had been working well from within the LAN when users were connecting with ICA from a WYSE ThinOS based terminal.  However when connecting from a Windows based workstation using a XenApp or XenDesktop plugin the performance suffered.  My first thought was something was different about the way in which the terminal handled multimedia, SpeedScreen, HDX, etc.</p>
<p>Thinking that I could reproduce this I started down the path of trying older clients until I found one that worked.  Then I could read the release notes and try to figure out exactly what was or wasn&#8217;t needed to make this application perform well.  Aside from taking a trip down memory lane by installing some pretty old clients I was never able to make the application perform well from the Windows based workstation.</p>
<p>Now I know that disabling HDX Multimedia Acceleration is just a check box away in XenApp, the same cannot be said for XenDesktop.  The console for XenDesktop 3 does not have anywhere near the number of configuration items as its close relative XenApp 5 does.</p>
<p>Only in the release notes for an updated Virtual Desktop Agent (<a href="http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX122963">CTX122963</a>) did I finally find my answer.</p>
<p><strong>On the virtual desktop:</strong></p>
<p><code><br />
Set the following DWORD to false</code></p>
<p><code>HKLM\SOFTWARE\Citrix\ICA Client\Engine\Lockdown Profiles\All Regions\Lockdown\Virtual Channels\Multimedia\SpeedScreenMMA</code></p>
<p><strong>On the Desktop Delivery Controller:</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>At a command prompt, cd to C:\Program Files\Citrix\Desktop Delivery Controller.</li>
<li>Execute PorticaSetDefaults.exe /o &lt;filename.xml&gt; to create an editable settings XML file.</li>
<li>Open the xml file created in the previous step and locate the <em>SpeedScreen Multimedia</em> section.</li>
<li>Change the entry for &lt;Enabled&gt;<em>true</em>&lt;/Enabled&gt; (default) of the <em>SpeedScreen Multimedia</em> section to &lt;Enabled&gt;<em>false</em>&lt;/Enabled&gt;.</li>
<li>Save your changes.</li>
<li>Reimport the settings using Porticasetdefaults /i. The settings will take effect the next time a Virtual Desktop Controller registers against this Desktop Delivery Controller.</li>
<li>Repeat the previous step on every Desktop Delivery Controller that conducts VDA registrations.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2010/01/23/disable-multimedia-acceleration-in-xendesktop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transfer Logins Between SQL Server Instances</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2010/01/18/transfer-logins-between-sql-server-instances/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2010/01/18/transfer-logins-between-sql-server-instances/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sql server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelcolson.com/?p=337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are any number of reasons that you might need to transfer the logins between instances of SQL Server. One of the most common times this is necessary is when performing a SQL Server consolidation or migration.  The good news is that its a fairly easy task to perform for several generations of SQL <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.michaelcolson.com/2010/01/18/transfer-logins-between-sql-server-instances/">Transfer Logins Between SQL Server Instances</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are any number of reasons that you might need to transfer the logins between instances of SQL Server.  One of the most common times this is necessary is when performing a SQL Server consolidation or migration.  The good news is that its a fairly easy task to perform for several generations of SQL Server.</p>
<p><span id="more-337"></span></p>
<p>Most of the older SQL Server versions required you to create a data transformation services (DTS) job to transfer the logins while the newer versions all you to execute some SQL scripts.  Either way Microsoft has produced two knowledge base articles on both procedures:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246133">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246133</a></li>
<li><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918992">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918992</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2010/01/18/transfer-logins-between-sql-server-instances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>XenApp 5 FP 2 First Impressions</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2009/10/06/xenapp-5-fp-2-first-impressions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2009/10/06/xenapp-5-fp-2-first-impressions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xenapp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelcolson.com/?p=334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I did my first XenApp 5 Feature Pack 2 upgrade/install today and I have to say that for the fist time the installer is actually quite nice.  If you hadn&#8217;t heard, Citrix has finally combined all of the components of XenApp into a single ISO image.</p> <p></p> <p>Now from a single DVD you can <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.michaelcolson.com/2009/10/06/xenapp-5-fp-2-first-impressions/">XenApp 5 FP 2 First Impressions</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did my first XenApp 5 Feature Pack 2 upgrade/install today and I have to say that for the fist time the installer is actually quite nice.  If you hadn&#8217;t heard, Citrix has finally combined all of the components of XenApp into a single ISO image.</p>
<p><span id="more-334"></span></p>
<p>Now from a single DVD you can install XenApp 5.0 with HFRU5, Password Manager, EdgeSight, SmartAuditor, Web Interface, etc.  It made my upgrade process so easy all I had to do was run through the wizard select the components I wanted to upgrade and after a reboot all was done.</p>
<p>Even on a new installation I was able to save quite a bit of time as all of the components for Password Manager and EdgeSight were installed as a part of the overall XenApp installation.</p>
<p>Great job Citrix on getting all of this stuff together in one place!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2009/10/06/xenapp-5-fp-2-first-impressions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>XenServer Multipathing with IBM DS4800</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2009/10/02/xenserver-multipathing-with-ibm-ds4800/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2009/10/02/xenserver-multipathing-with-ibm-ds4800/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xenserver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelcolson.com/?p=332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I was recently tasked with configuring multipathing in Citrix XenServer 5.5 for use with an IBM DS4800 SAN.  At first glance I thought, piece of cake, I&#8217;ve done quite a few setups like this with Dell, EMC, and HP storage gear so the IBM should be the same right?  WRONG!</p> <p></p> <p>There are two <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.michaelcolson.com/2009/10/02/xenserver-multipathing-with-ibm-ds4800/">XenServer Multipathing with IBM DS4800</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was recently tasked with configuring multipathing in Citrix XenServer 5.5 for use with an IBM DS4800 SAN.  At first glance I thought, piece of cake, I&#8217;ve done quite a few setups like this with Dell, EMC, and HP storage gear so the IBM should be the same right?  WRONG!</p>
<p><span id="more-332"></span></p>
<p>There are two multipathing drivers that have been available since XenServer 5.0 SP2.  They are the DMP (dynamic multipath) and MPP (multipath proxy).  DMP is the one that is used by default.  In fact when you go into XenCenter and enable the check box for &#8216;multipathing&#8217; you are essentially turning on DMP.  Normally this works well but the IBM DS4800 and other storage controllers that use RDAC (redundant disk array controller) need a little more.</p>
<p>If you just go through and enable the DMP driver you&#8217;ll be able to see, format, and use the storage from the DS4800&#8230; but what you&#8217;ll eventually notice is that the LUN will continually failover to another path using a different storage controller.  This is called thrashing and its not a good thing.</p>
<p>To stop the thrashing you&#8217;ll need to do one of two things:  1) tell the DS4800 to disallow AVT (automatic volume transfer) or 2) tell the XenServer to pick a path and stick with it until a failover is necessary (i.e. STOP THE ROUND ROBIN)</p>
<p>The first option of disabling AVT is actually the easier of the two and is done on the storage controller itself.  Don&#8217;t worry you can set this by LUN or even by host so you won&#8217;t be in danger of tampering with your other SAN attached systems.  The way to do this in the IBM DS4800 is to change the host type to something that doesn&#8217;t perform AVT.  The host type of Linux VMware Cluster or LNXCLUVMWARE should do the trick.</p>
<p>The second method of chaning the driver over from DMP to MPP is not as easy.  If you go out and do some searches on the matter you&#8217;ll find that Citrix states in <a href="http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX121364">CTX121364</a> &#8221;This is the real RDAC driver supported by IBM and other vendors&#8221; about the MPP driver.  What you won&#8217;t find in that article are steps to enable and actually use the MPP driver.  Your searching might even land you at <a href="http://support.citrix.com/article/ctx118791">CTX118791</a> where you might find specific reference to the IBM DS4xxx.  But once again you&#8217;ll be hard pressed to actually find out how to get this thing working.</p>
<p>I recently spoke with the XenServer support team and got some instructios on how to enable the MPP driver in place of the DMP driver.  Its not an official CTX article yet but my understanding is that they are working on it.  Even when it does get released it won&#8217;t be for the faint of heart.  I should also point out that the cute little &#8220;4 of 4 paths active&#8217; notification that you see in XenCenter ONLY works with DMP so once you switch over to MPP you&#8217;ll lose that information.</p>
<p>Changing the host type on the storage controller is definately the easiest and it will allow you to continue to see the multipathing information in XenCenter.  But it definately seems to struggle with performance.  I think this is largely due to the fact that XenServer is still trying to use round robin multipathing but the IBM DS4800 is not allowing access to the LUN through one of the controllers&#8230; meaning up to 50% of your I/O requests from XenServer will not be fullfilled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2009/10/02/xenserver-multipathing-with-ibm-ds4800/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Office Suite Scalability on Terminal Services</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2009/10/02/office-suite-scalability-on-terminal-services/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2009/10/02/office-suite-scalability-on-terminal-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terminal services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelcolson.com/?p=328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A colleague of mine recently pointed me to this great article on the scalability of office productivity suites on terminal services. The tests reviewed OpenOffice 2.1, Microsoft Office 2003, and Microsoft Office 2007.</p> <p></p> <p>The testers also put the 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Windows to the test to see if there was any <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.michaelcolson.com/2009/10/02/office-suite-scalability-on-terminal-services/">Office Suite Scalability on Terminal Services</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A colleague of mine recently pointed me to this great article on the scalability of office productivity suites on terminal services. The tests reviewed OpenOffice 2.1, Microsoft Office 2003, and Microsoft Office 2007.</p>
<p><span id="more-328"></span></p>
<p>The testers also put the 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Windows to the test to see if there was any difference.  You can view the study in its <a href="http://wtstek.com/articles/20070510-01-scalability-of-office-suites-on-terminal-servers.htm">entirety</a> or you can just skip ahead to the <a href="http://wtstek.com/articles/20070510-05-scalability-of-office-suites-on-terminal-servers.htm">results</a>.</p>
<p>The bottom line of the tests show that you will get the highest number of active sessions with Microsoft Office 2003.  Suprisingly Microsoft Office 2007 isn&#8217;t all that far behind.  I ususally hear rumblings of how Microsoft Office 2007 is a memory hog but this test seems to debunk that myth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2009/10/02/office-suite-scalability-on-terminal-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Citrix Certifications Ever Keep Up with Product Releases?</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2009/06/25/can-citrix-certifications-ever-keep-up-with-product-releases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2009/06/25/can-citrix-certifications-ever-keep-up-with-product-releases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citrix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelcolson.com/?p=325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Lately I have been on a tear when it comes to taking Citrix certification tests.  I&#8217;m eagerly awaiting the release of the exams needed to upgrade my CCEA to the new CCEE.  But a troubling trend has begun to emerge, the exams and certifications seem to have a longer development cycle than the products <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.michaelcolson.com/2009/06/25/can-citrix-certifications-ever-keep-up-with-product-releases/">Can Citrix Certifications Ever Keep Up with Product Releases?</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lately I have been on a tear when it comes to taking Citrix certification tests.  I&#8217;m eagerly awaiting the release of the exams needed to upgrade my CCEA to the new CCEE.  But a troubling trend has begun to emerge, the exams and certifications seem to have a longer development cycle than the products themselves.</p>
<p><span id="more-325"></span>I have to admit, this really isn&#8217;t a new trend in the world of certifications. And to be fair you can&#8217;t really expect an exam and corresponding certification to roll out of the door the same day products go RTM.</p>
<p>My best example of this is the exact certification program that I mentioned earlier&#8230;  the CCEA/CCEE program.  The current CCEA is based on the Citrix Access Suite 4.0 which includes Access Gateway 4.2, Password Manager 4.1, Presentation Server 4.0, and Web Interface 4.2.  Seriously?  I don&#8217;t know about the rest of the components of this bunch but I can tell you that Presentation Server 4.0 will be end of life and end of support by the end of the calendar year 2009!  And it is STILL the most current engineer level certification that Citrix offers!</p>
<p>In defense of Citrix, they have announced and released almost all of the bits and pieces for the successor of the CCEA.. the CCEE program.  At the time of writing all but one exam are available for this certification with the final exam not scheduled to be released until the fourth quarter of 2009.  No big deal right?  Well&#8230;  except that nearly every single product that will be in the &#8216;final&#8217; exam will already be at least one revision behind!</p>
<p>The final CCEE exam has been rumored to be similar to the final exam in the CCEA program where candidates will be expected to perform a series of tasks in addition to answering multiple choice questions.  It is rumored that the exam will cover the following products:  Provisioning Server 5.0, XenApp 5.0 for Windows Server 2008, XenDesktop 2.0, and XenServer 5.0.</p>
<p>The problem?  Today the current releases are:  Provisioning Server 5.1, XenApp 5.0 for Windows Server 2008, XenDesktop 3.0, and XenServer 5.5.  The test hasn&#8217;t even been relased and it is already rumored to be based on older technology.</p>
<p>So I pose the question again&#8230; Can Citrix certifications (or any vendor for that matter) keep up with product releases?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2009/06/25/can-citrix-certifications-ever-keep-up-with-product-releases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Underutilized Features of XenApp Platinum</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2009/06/23/underutilized-features-of-xenapp-platinum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2009/06/23/underutilized-features-of-xenapp-platinum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edgesight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[password manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xenapp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelcolson.com/?p=317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who has worked with or around Citrix licensing knows that there is an incredible amount of value that can be obtained by either upgrading or purchasing XenApp Platinum Edition licenses.  But most people who go the route of Platinum licenses aren&#8217;t utilizing all of the features.</p> <p></p> <p>I completely agree that licensing can <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.michaelcolson.com/2009/06/23/underutilized-features-of-xenapp-platinum/">Underutilized Features of XenApp Platinum</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who has worked with or around Citrix licensing knows that there is an incredible amount of value that can be obtained by either upgrading or purchasing XenApp Platinum Edition licenses.  But most people who go the route of Platinum licenses aren&#8217;t utilizing all of the features.</p>
<p><span id="more-317"></span></p>
<p>I completely agree that licensing can be a real pain sometimes especially when there are frequent changes as there seem to have been lately with  Citrix XenApp licensing.  I would love to post a simple listing of what products are included with the XenApp Platinum license&#8230; but unfortunately it just isn&#8217;t that simple.  It turns out that for some products like EdgeSight portions of the product are included with Advanced and Enterprise with the all of the individual product features being exposed only in the Platinum license.</p>
<p>OK so I admit that I may not have cleared up any licensing mysteries here, but that wasn&#8217;t my goal.  On with the show.  Here are what I feel are the most often overlooked features or products in the XenApp Platinum suite.</p>
<p><strong>Citrix EdgeSight for Load Testing</strong>- If you can honestly tell me that you have never had to answer the question &#8220;how many users can I expect to get on a single XenApp server&#8221; then I would say you haven&#8217;t built too many XenApp environments.  Citrix EdgeSight for Load Testing is an amazing product that allows you to record and replay interactions with XenApp published applications.  Once you have your set of instructions compiled you can then setup a test by replaying those instructions over and over again until you find the breaking points or performance thresholds you are looking for.</p>
<p><strong>Citrix Password Manager</strong>- Quite possibly my favorite Citrix product <img src='http://www.michaelcolson.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   I use Password Manager EVERYDAY for single sign-on to what feels like about 1000 different applications.  Password Manager as you may have guessed is a single sign-on product that also has self service password functionality.  I find that right out of the box (without complex scripting) I have a very high success rate with configuring applications for single sign-on.  Furthermore, Citrix has expanded the licensing terms of Password Manger to extend its reach to both desktop and offline users!  If you are constantly setting, forgetting, and resetting password on websites you NEED to try Password Manager.</p>
<p><strong>Citrix SmartAuditor</strong>- If you have ever worked in any type of support role you know how difficult it can be to diagnose or troubleshoot a problem without some vision into what the end user is seeing.  SmartAuditor can address this problem area by recording sessions and allowing for storage and playback at a later date.  SmartAuditor may also help to address some compliance issues you may have because you can now have a complete visual representation for auditing instead of combing through logs from multiple systems.  <em>I do have to say that I really liked the older name of this product:  Project IRIS (ICA Record ICA Surveillance).</em></p>
<p>I should point out that I purposely left out the XenApp Platinum features that require additional appliances.  I should also point out that EdgeSight for Load Testing is actually available to XenApp Enterprise and XenApp Platinum customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2009/06/23/underutilized-features-of-xenapp-platinum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hot Desktop Functionality Broken in Password Manager Agent</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2009/06/16/hot-desktop-functionality-broken-in-password-manager-agent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2009/06/16/hot-desktop-functionality-broken-in-password-manager-agent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[password manager]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelcolson.com/?p=222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In working on a new deployment of the Hot Desktop feature within Citrix Password Manager I discovered that there are a few problems with the latest Password Manager agents.</p> <p>Ok so there are more than just a few problems&#8230;  Basically Hot Desktop doesn&#8217;t work with Password Manager Agents 4.6.265 and 4.6.266.</p> <p>When using either <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.michaelcolson.com/2009/06/16/hot-desktop-functionality-broken-in-password-manager-agent/">Hot Desktop Functionality Broken in Password Manager Agent</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In working on a new deployment of the Hot Desktop feature within Citrix Password Manager I discovered that there are a few problems with the latest Password Manager agents.</p>
<p><span id="more-222"></span>Ok so there are more than just a few problems&#8230;  Basically Hot Desktop doesn&#8217;t work with Password Manager Agents 4.6.265 and 4.6.266.</p>
<p>When using either one of these two agents you will find that Hot Desktop installs without incident but the process that executes the session.xml functions only appears to be triggered on the first logon after a reboot.  That&#8217;s a BIG problem because the whole idea behind Hot Desktop is the fast switching from one user account to another!  So if you have to reboot each time a user logs off just to prepare the system for the next user then you probably aren&#8217;t shaving very much time off of the logon process.</p>
<p>The good news is that Password Manager Agent 4.6.264 DOES work properly with Hot Desktop.  The bad news&#8230; it doesn&#8217;t support the new XenApp Platinum licensing model for desktop and offline usage.  As it turns out this isn&#8217;t that big of a problem because it&#8217;s not very likely that you would need the Hot Desktop functionality in a disconnected or offline mode.</p>
<p>I briefly spoke with Citrix support and they verbally acknowledged that in fact they were aware the functionality was missing or broken in the two latest agents.  I didn&#8217;t get a very clear sense of when or if a fix would be available but I did hear that a new release of Password Manager might be on the horizon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelcolson.com/2009/06/16/hot-desktop-functionality-broken-in-password-manager-agent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.381 seconds -->

